🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's parliament members have voted to pull out from an global treaty created to safeguard women from violence, including domestic abuse, following prolonged and intense debates in the parliament.

Thousands of demonstrators assembled in the capital this past week to oppose the decision. The ultimate authority now lies with Head of State Edgars Rinkevics, who must determine whether to endorse or veto the proposed law.

Known as the Istanbul Convention, the 2011 agreement only became active in the Baltic state last year, requiring governments to develop legal frameworks and assistance programs to eliminate all types of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the initial European Union member to initiate the process of exiting from the convention. Turkey withdrew in two years ago, a decision that rights groups characterized as a major setback for gender equality.

Ideological Controversy and Resistance

The treaty was ratified by the EU in 2023, yet traditionalist groups have contended that its emphasis on gender equality weakens family values and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy discussion in the Latvian parliament, lawmakers decided by a margin of 56-32 to exit from the treaty, a move proposed by opposition parties but backed by representatives from one of the three governing partners.

The outcome represents a defeat for moderate conservative government leader the nation's PM, who joined protesters outside parliament earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will persist in our struggle so that violence does not triumph," she declared to the assembly.

Political Disagreements and Responses

One of the primary political groups supporting the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose head has called on the public to select from what he terms a "natural family" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities".

Latvia's ombudswoman the rights official urged the agreement not to be made political, while the group the rights organization asserted it was "not a danger to Latvian values, it was an instrument to realize them".

The recent vote has provoked broad outcry both within the country and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand individuals have signed a national petition demanding the convention to be preserved. The women's rights organization Centrs Marta has called a demonstration for next Thursday, charging lawmakers of disregarding the wishes of the nation's citizens.

International Concerns and Possible Future Actions

The leader of the European organization's parliamentary assembly commented that the Baltic state had made a rash choice driven by misinformation. He characterized it as an "unprecedented and deeply concerning step backward for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in the continent".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the treaty four years ago, cases of gender-based killings and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not secure a supermajority majority, the head of state could potentially send back the legislation for additional consideration if he holds concerns.

President Rinkevics stated on digital platforms that he would evaluate the vote according to constitutional requirements, "taking into account governmental and judicial factors, rather than belief-based viewpoints".

Recently, another component of the governing alliance, the reformist party, indicated it would not exclude appealing to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a concerning situation for gender equality not only in our nation but across the continent," commented a rights advocate.

• Domestic abuse rates have been increasing in multiple European nations
• The Istanbul Convention mandates particular legal protections for victims of domestic abuse
• Latvia's vote could affect similar discussions in additional EU countries